What Is The National Sunday Law?

The angels in the chamber guarding the Ark of The Covenant told Ron Wyatt that the tables of stone would be shown to the world after a national Sunday law is legislated. Why does God choose this time and why would He be against a national Sunday law?

Sunday are for many people a day to the glory of God and Christ resurrection. That God may be strongly against a law like this seem therefore strange and to not make any sense. It might even seem not Christ-like.
The only ones who have warned against such a coming law are the Seventh Day Adventist church, who have claimed the enforcement of a Sunday law is what the book of Revelation call “the Mark of the Beast”. To most Christians, the mark of the beast is a computer chip or something related.

God choosing a man, who believes the national Sunday law is the Mark of the Beast, to find the Ark and prepare the world for it to be shown, have some puzzled. Ron also told that the angels protecting the Ark confirmed this to be the last end time conflict that will cause God to show the ten commandments, and this has also caused many to take offense.

Part of the reasons the meaning is not understood and seem so far out there is because of all the false ideas that have been introduced to evangelical churches for a long time.
The idea that God’s law is no longer valid after the cross.
Spite Christ saying nothing would be done away with, that He came to represent God’s law and teaching and not His own law and teaching, and that all the apostles say that obedience to God is still a thing, many Christians reject the validity of God’s law based on the writings of Paul alone (Matt.5,17-19; Joh_5:43; Joh 8:28, John 5:30; John 7:16, Joh_15:10; Mar_10:19; Act_5:32;  Mat_28:20).
Peter in one of his letters urges people to not misunderstand Paul. He warns: “And account that the longsuffering of our Lord is salvation; even as our beloved brother Paul also according to the wisdom given unto him hath written unto you; As also in all his epistles, speaking in them of these things; in which are some things hard to be understood, which they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.» (2Pe 3:15-16)
That’s right, Paul is the only writer in the Bible that the Bible itself warns us against misunderstanding. Misunderstand this one Biblical writer and we might be lead into destruction. That also means that churches, pastors and priests that misguide their congregations in regards to the writings of Paul can end up leading their congregations to destruction. That is very serious. And, according to Peter, this misinterpretation has been going on from his time. Peter explained that it was the “unlearned”, who was the new heathen believers, that didn’t have knowledge in the Scripture and the law.
Christian people all over the world continue to speak against God’s law as it were evil with what they think is support from Paul. Paul has become to them the new lawgiver, the one who has started a new religious direction free from the practices even Jesus followed.
Paul himself said who was behind the future movement that was to twist all his words: “For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them» (Act 20:29-30). 
But as you might say, most people agree that God’s moral law is still valid. That’s right, they only claim it’s done away with if you mentioned the fourth commandment, the Sabbath (the original from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday). Evangelicals and even Catholics will accept ‘God’s law’ if they can be free to disregard the Sabbath for the sake of their own church ordained sabbath. Basically, the Sabbath is the conflict-area of the law. The one command in the ten commandments they have an issue with.
Some think God only abolished the fourth commandment. It’s logic to say that Christ, on the cross, didn’t abolish the law against stealing, witnessing falsely, worshipping other gods or even killing. Their problem is the Seventh-day Sabbath (the original from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday). Not a Sabbath, as they eagerly want to protect Sunday as a sabbath seeing the need for having a day set aside for worship and rest, just not the Biblical Sabbath. The movements wanting to legalize Sunday-sabbath, by their actions and arguments, they show that they agree with the need of the fourth commandment. They understand the point of it, they even want it as law just like God placed it in His law. Their action speaks against the idea that God would regard a sabbath as no longer important along with the other commandments. Yet they refuse to keep the commandment and sabbath God ordained. They will only keep the one the church ordained. The logic against God’s fourth commandment sabbath is therefore strange, to say the least. So why is a sabbath important, but not the Sabbath of the Bible?
To many Christians, the biblical Sabbath from sunset Friday to sunset Saturday, represents legalism, the old covenant, and many even seem to think we hurt Christ if we observe this commandment. Preachers have over and over again imprinted this message to their followers, that the Sabbath commandment is competition to being saved by faith. That we reject salvation through faith, and reject Christ, by keeping it. The result is that many feel they betray Christ if they try to keep the Biblical Sabbath over the Sunday-sabbath ordained by the church. They picture Christ turning their back on them in disappointment. That breaking the fourth commandment even makes Jesus happy. The biblical Sabbath and Jesus have become enemies. Where did they get this strange idea and thoughts? That the law made flesh, yes the sabbath made flesh, is against Himself? The idea that we reject faith by keeping the biblical sabbath comes from preachers who are using the writings of Paul as support. That is how they interpret him, they think he supports this view.
The strange thing then is that Paul himself both taught Jews and heathens on the Sabbath and not one single place does he speak against the Sabbath commandment. Peter explained: “they that are unlearned and unstable wrest, as they do also the other scriptures, unto their own destruction.” What is to be unlearned? In worldly wisdom? Paul says: “For the wisdom of this world is foolishness with God.” Jesus says there is no spiritual truth found in worldly wisdom: “the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive” (1.Cor.3,19; Joh.14,17) The unlearned Peter talks of is those unlearned in the law of God and of the prophets. They don’t know the difference between the ritual laws and the moral laws, they don’t understand the meaning of the laws. The prophet, even to the last one, warned that whosoever came and didn’t speak in harmony with the law was a deceiver and not sent by God (Mal_2:7). If Jesus abolished the law, if Paul really meant God’s moral law and Sabbath was done away with, then they were both what the law and the prophets warned against as deceivers. And because of this teaching by so many Christians, Jews view Christianity as a deception just like they have been taught by their prophets. What they don’t know is that this teaching against God’s law doesn’t come from the words of Christ, but by twisting the words of Paul.
Some say the Sabbath was only meant for the Jews. John the Baptist said God could create Jews from stones, Jesus said we are a descendant of whom we obey, and Paul said that the real Jew is he who has the law in his heart (Matt 3:9, Joh 8:39, Rom 2:28-29). Paul also said: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. Gal 3:29  And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise” (Gal 3:28-29). Paul said we graffed in on the tree with the Jews, not made into a separate tree. There are not two trees. The believer becomes part of Israel (Rom.11,17).
Not just Christians have separated the fourth-commandment sabbath from Christians, but Jews have as well. They claim only Jews should keep the biblical Sabbath. If you are pagan and a convert to Judaism you have to keep the Sabbath. But if you believe in Jesus, you are not allowed. Even they confess it’s not about if you have a heathen background, it’s about you accepting Judaism without Christ. Keep Christ and you don’t get to keep Sabbath. So many Christians and Jews alike claim the Sabbath and Christ does not belong together. An absurd view for a true Bible believer who believes Christ was the law manifested, meaning He was also the sabbath manifested. Jesus is the Sabbath made flesh (Joh 1:14)
So why are people so determined to attack the Sabbath and separate it from Christ? What is going on?

The resistance against the ten commandments is mostly directed at one single commandment, the Sabbath commandment. The Christians have made their own Sabbath commandment in honor of Christ, the Sunday, in its place. The biblical Sabbath is often used as a shopping day, everything that the command forbids. It’s used as a preparation day for the Sunday-sabbath. Even a cleaning day. God’s Sabbath commandment has become the servant of the Sunday-sabbath law. But shouldn’t God just be satisfied that man keep one day as Sabbath? So they didn’t pick the day He sanctified at creation and wrote with His own finger on the tables of stone, the one Christ Himself sanctified when He was here on earth, shouldn’t God just accept that His people on earth just thought another day would be more fit? Does it really matter? Can’t God just agree to change it to the Sabbath man have ordained instead? Why pick a fight with His followers on earth over a sabbath day? Why does God say: “My covenant will I not break, nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips (Psa_89:34 ) ?” Why does Jesus claim not “one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law”? Isn’t God being a bit difficult, can’t He meet mankind in the middle?
We who live here on earth, why can’t we have a say in what the Sabbath should be, wasn’t the Sabbath made for our sake?
But the question can be reversed. Why, when we see the
need of a sabbath, can’t we just pick the one God ordained, the one God sanctified. The one God says is a sign of His relationship with us? Why can’t we just let Him have His Sabbath? Why do we feel the need to change God’s law, transfer the holiness from one day to another if God is not glorified by it? Is not God perfect? Is not His law perfect? Is the law only perfect if man’s hand get to write the fourth commandment with their own finger? Do we not trust God knows what is best? The bottom line is this, if we can change or abolish one single of God’s commandments, we place ourselves above God. That is right, the act is to elevate ourselves above the lawgiver. The one who makes and maintain the law is the one in authority. If we can dismiss or change a law we ultimately have placed ourselves above God in authority. The angel speaking to the prophet Daniel confirms this: “And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws” (Dan.7,25) Now this was the devil’s agenda from the very beginning: “How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! how art thou cut down to the ground, which didst weaken the nations! For thou hast said in thine heart, I will ascend into heaven, I will exalt my throne above the stars of God: I will sit also upon the mount of the congregation, in the sides of the north” (Isa 14:12-13) 
God’s throne consisted of His law, the law is the foundation of His throne. And in that law is the Sabbath commandment, part of the foundation of God’s throne and authority. Lucifer convinced Eve that she could eat from the tree God forbade and become her own god. He was a liar. Today he tells this lie with the help of Christian preachers, that God doesn’t mind if you set His command to the side for the sake of your own. But anyone who does is rocking the foundation of God’s throne on heaven and on earth. The change of the Sabbath is considered a rebellion against God’s throne in the courts of heaven. A rebellion against the law-giver, the supreme judge, the life-giver, the creator Himself. The Father that Christ sought to do the will of. Lucifer has given his traits to Jesus Christ and made Him a rebel against God’s law in the sense that He has convinced Christians that Jesus abolished God’s law. That because of Christ merits, you are free to break God’s laws or change them or even make your own. You have become your own god, your own lawgiver. This is the gospel of lawlessness that Paul and everyone warned against.

This is part of why the Sabbath-Sunday question has become the core of the conflict.
You see the Bible tells us God will only accept a repentant sinner, someone who agrees and confesses to having sinned. Who are sorry for having opposed God’s laws and by it sinned (Jn.3:4). They are the ones who will take part in Christ atonement. The one who is still in opposition towards God and His laws will not have a part in the blood. The gospel that you will be saved by Christ sacrificed without acknowledging that the breaking of God’s law is sin, is a false and deceptive gospel.
Every sacrifice that was made had to be taken in front of the tabernacle and the throne with God’s law in order to be accepted as an atoning sacrifice (Leviticus chapters 1 to 4). This was because part of the sacrifice was to acknowledge the authority in God’s law. If the sacrifice was not brought before the law, it says the sacrifice will not save that person (Lev.17,1-9). Anyone asking for Christ atonement to be implemented to them who does not acknowledge the law, that doesn’t come before God’s throne containing the law repentant will have to bear their own sin. How great the deception that the devil has placed inside the churches. Millions think they have a part in the blood and worship God while still carrying their own sins. It’s the ultimate deception, a false sense of security.

Most Christians are in opposition to God’s law, they are not repentant. They refuse to acknowledge that they have sinned when broken the fourth commandment. Go try, tell an evangelical or protestant or even Catholic that they have sinned when breaking God’s original Sabbath, they will argue against. They agree all the other nine or eight is a sin, but they refuse that their breaking of the fourth, or having changed the fourth to Sunday, is a sin.
And so Christians might be in a huge dilemma. They might not get part in the atoning blood, because they refuse to acknowledge they have sinned against God.

Paul always added a confirmation that the law is valid to his speeches to make sure his meaning was not misunderstood: “But we know that the law is good if a man use it lawfully” (1Ti_1:8)
“Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.” (Rom.7:12).
“Do we then make void the law through faith? God forbid: yea, we establish the law” (Rom.3,31)
“What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? 
God forbid. How shall we, that are dead to sin, live any longer therein?” (Rom 6:1-2)

So to many Paul seem to say two contradicting things. But this is only by the help of Satans workers who have twisted his words. Pauls teaching is extremely important for the believer if understood in the right context. Paul never spoke against God’s law, if he did he would have been in conflict with both the prophets and Jesus and therefore a deceiver we ought not to listen to. Paul was a preacher, a man, he didn’t have the mandate to change God’s law or declare it abolished. No man has been given that authority, and if he did he would have placed himself over God. Paul was addressing multiple problems the early church faced. We will look at three of them.

1. The ritual laws continued in the Temple, could this still offer atonement? Should they take part? None of the moral laws, including the fourth commandment, was tied to sacrificial laws. In fact, Sabbath was instituted and made holy for the planet before there even was any sin (Gen.2,2-3). Sabbath wasn’t given as an atonement for sin. Paul was talking about the sacrificial laws that many clung to thinking it could bring them salvation, the sacrifice of animals. And although the action of sacrificing had been physical, it was now replaced with the faith in Christ sacrifice. In these instances, Paul never meant God’s moral law and the foundation of His throne was the problem. It was the sacrificial laws that were abolished by Christ sacrifice.
The moral law revealed what sin was. The sacrificial laws gave the remedy.
And so when Christ sacrificed Himself He gave the ultimate redemption. The law that was competing with Christ sacrifice was the sacrificial law, while the moral law was to lead people to Christ.

2. Paul also made the points that we cannot atone past sins by doing good deeds. Many people still think that way today. That if we outweigh the bad things we do with many good things, we have ourselves atoned for our bad deeds. Paul speaks greatly against such an idea. Every sin that we have committed is written in the books of heaven, and nothing we can do that is good, can blot away what we did that was bad. If it could, God would have provided man with an excuse to sin. We cannot kill one man and save another life and think we have nulled out our transgression. Many Jews and heathens did think this way in the time of Paul and even up until our own time. We feel guilty over things we have done but feel better if we do something good. This is another false sense of security. Paul made the argument that this philosophy was a sham and that the only thing that could blot out our past transgressions, no matter how good we now had become, was the blood sacrifice, the blood of Christ.
This included the ten commandments. We could not wipe away our past transgressions to this law by now keeping it. The only thing that comes out of keeping it was that we didn’t add sins to that book. But it couldn’t wipe away what was already in there. Only the blood of Christ could. This was Pauls point and argument, not that the law was done away with because God felt us trying to do what is right and obey Him was a rejection of Christ. What a strange assumption by those twisting Pauls words. But many are taught to read the bible that way and they only see in the text what they have been told to read into it.

3. Another point Paul was making in his letter was that even if we wanted to stop sinning and keep God’s moral law, why did we still fail over and over again? Every time we failed we came “under the law” again.
Yes, those unlearned who have twisted Pauls words claim being under the law is the horrible act of obeying God’s commandments. But Paul is saying being under the law means to be condemned by it because WE HAVE TRANSGRESSED IT. That means you are under the law when you break it not when you keep it. The devil has been so clever in changing the meaning to the opposite of its meaning. We are free from the law when we have given our sins to Christ and He has taken them upon the cross for our sake. But if we go back to our sinful ways, we become under the law again.
Now, this should not be hard to understand. If the logic of many evangelicals is right then the moment we turn to Christ we are now free to continue and sin as much as we want. For those who are in Christ cannot be condemned?
So I turned to Christ today and witness falsely tomorrow I’m still free right? No, I have to again go to Christ with my sin to be free. Many evangelicals think Paul is saying the opposite of what he is actually saying. Paul says that once Christ has freed us from our sins, we cannot go back and continue sinning without again coming in conflict with the law aka ‘under the law’. The Jews were under the law because they would not accept Christ, they had no atonement, the law witnessed against

them. The Jews were under the law because they were lawbreakers without atonement as the sacrificial system no longer could provide them with atonement.
Paul argues that if we stay in Christ, in His spirit, we can live as He lived. We can be free and not continue to end up ‘under the law’. But to many, the idea of gaining victory over sin in our lives seemed impossible. If you had an abusive husband who kept beating you and asking for forgiveness, would you not eventually claim he had to stop the abuse in order for you to stay?
Even earthly judges don’t acquit people of crimes because they felt their bodies forced them to sin? Can a father who has raped his child claim his flesh is weak and therefore he should continue the abuse? Of course not. We humans except that when we do bad things we have to stop. We except no cause of “weakness” or “bodily dysfunctions” as a right to continue to abuse others. God demands the same. He demands that we change. Jesus came as our example to take away any excuse we might think we have for sinning. There is no excuse or “free-card” to sin in the Bible. So how does the repentant sinner, after giving his sin to Christ, stop doing his evil deeds?
How do we gain victory over the sin in our lives? Paul said over and over again that we couldn’t continue sinning with God’s blessing even though Christ had paid the penalty for our past sins. We needed to turn from our ways. In fact, every single book in the Bible tells us that God wants us to turn from our ways, to stop sinning, to stop doing that which is wrong. Find one single book that doesn’t give that same message.
If this is impossible, for someone to go from being a lawbreaker to a law-keeper why do they all, including Jesus, ask it of us? Would God ask and demand the impossible? Am I not forced by my body weakness to witness falsely about my friend causing him to be fired? Paul discusses how to practically turn from our ways. By legalism or by crucifying ourselves and living by faith? This was an important topic for Paul who wanted to see a transformation inside the churches, he wanted to see a victorious people representing that which is good. Not a house full of Baal worshippers, fornicators, liars and such.
I think most people understand that we cannot conquer sin in our lives if we are focused on our failures if we think we can do it in our own strength or when we struggle with disbelief. Faith was the key to victory. Faith in God’s love for us, faith in what He did for us. By beholding Christ and His sacrifice we would be healed from temptations. But trying to conquer sin by our own strength or relying on our own righteousness, would only lead us to fall again and again. To not have confidence in self but in Christ. This was the key to success and to not end up under the law again.
While if we gain victory over our sins by faith, by staying in Christ, we would not be ’under the law’ because we would no longer be condemned by it.
The miracle Paul describes in referring to God’s promise to those who would enter into a covenant with him is: “I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people” (Heb.8,10)

And so these three topics were important to Paul and he addressed them over and over again in all his letter. 1) Could atonement still be obtained by the ritual services, 2) Can good deeds atone for our bad deeds, 3) and how could we avoid falling in sin and by it again coming under its curse after Christ had freed us from our debts?

These valuable and incredible teachings were twisted. The devil’s workers claimed and infiltrated the early church and they started believing that Paul was trying to say we no longer needed to keep God’s law, further than that, that keeping God’s law was a rejection of Christ. That even keeping God’s law was evil. Only the serpent in the tree could make breaking God’s law seem like a good thing that would bring blessings.
Only the sacrificial rituals and the acceptance of an earthly high priest were a rejection of Christ, who is our only atonement and high priest working in the only temple of God, the tabernacle in heaven (Heb.8 & Revelation). God’s moral law was not the problem. The problem is and always was us rebelling against God’s authority.
It’s our sins, our breaking of the law, that is bad. Not the law. The law is the definition of righteousness.
Peter had said that those who twisted Pauls words were unlearned. They twist it to their own destruction, they twist Pauls meaning to speak against obedience to God’s law. What happens when we receive wisdom from God? “Give me understanding, and I shall keep thy law; yea, I shall observe it with my whole heart” (Psa 119:34).  That is the difference from being unlearned to being learned, we go from disobedience to obedience.

The Bible tells us repeatedly that the law is good and righteous. It says Christ obeyed the law, that was His righteousness. And so if God’s law is flawed we are basically calling Christ righteousness flawed. Any attack we make on God’s law is an attack on Christ. Christ is the law manifested. If we say the law is the cause of evil, we really say Christ is the cause of evil. If we say being obedient to the law leads to perdition, we actually say obedience to Christ and His example leads to perdition.

So when the devil created a gospel saying part of the law is flawed or not for the new covenant, or that it needs to be changed or that it can be violated, he is fooling millions upon millions of Christians into a false sense of security. They are deceived and the risk is what Peter said: «unto their own destruction». According to Revelation, all the world will be judged according to God’s law. ( Rev.11,18-19; 15,5 & 8 ) To be found preaching against it, teaching against the observance of it, or to have changed parts of it, will be considered rebellion against the Creator at Christ second coming, and because there has been no repentance only defiance, Christ blood will not cover their sins. The sacrifice was not brought to the tabernacle, the blood will come upon themselves (Lev.17)
“The false prophet” mentioned in Revelation that works together with the beast and the devil himself is by many Christians today claimed to be Mohammed or Islam. The devil has given them a scapegoat. But it is themselves. They are the false prophet. In the Bible, a false prophet arises among God’s congregation and his message is always the same, that you have not sinned and that you need not turn from your ways. That God will protect you regardless, that Jerusalem will not fall.
The real prophet is always the one who tells them they have sinned, who tells them they have to stop sinning and turn to God or they will be lost. Go read through the bible chapter after chapter.
The Christian movement that says God will save you even though you have changed and abolished his law IS THE FALSE PROPHET. But some will say, but look at all the miracles in Christ name they performing? Isn’t it a sign they are telling the truth? “And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone” (Rev.19:20). “And I saw three unclean spirits like frogs come out of the mouth of the dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet.” (Rev.16,13) “And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed into an angel of light. Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also are transformed as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works” (2Co 11:14-15). 
In the end time, Christians are their own worst enemy.

The Sunday Law
The Sunday law is in the middle of the conflict because it addresses the biggest attack those who claim to serve God has done towards God. One of the biggest crimes.
The Sabbath commandment is founded alone on the fact that God is the Creator and lawgiver. Meaning the only reason God could make the Sabbath commandment was because of His identity. When man changes this very commandment they are rebelling against God’s authority as Creator and law-maker. They are attacking the foundation of God’s throne, against His Kingship over the earth.
When other Biblical characters did this, replaced God’s command with their own while saying their own is to God’s glory, God has rejected them and their worship (1Sa_15:21-22; 1Ki 12:32-33 & 1Ki_16:19; Mat 7:22-23, Isa_1:15).
The devil knows this, that is why, not being able to keep people from being attracted to Christ, instead of turning people against the gospel, he twisted it so that mankind would think they were worshiping God while he knew God was rejecting their worship because it had rebellion in it.

God said He had created the earth and that the earth belonged to Him. And because of this, we should respect His Sabbath commandment. When the world joins together in Sunday-legislation God see this has a co-joined final rebellion against His authority. If the Creator doesn’t get to set the rules for His worship, but man set up a competing rule of worship that places man above the creator as a law-giver, He has to let people know the truth. That it’s all a lie. A lie they think is going to save them all.

Sunday is the sacrifice of Cain
Sunday-legislation is the sacrifice of Cain. It’s said to be done to God’s glory, but God has no pleasure in it. “Cain brought of the fruit of the ground an offering unto the LORD. …But unto Cain and to his offering he had not respect.» (Gen.4,3 & 5)
The moment Sunday is legislated on a massive scale and God has revealed His law and enlightened mankind that only His law is valid worship of Him and that Sunday is an imposter-worship

day, and mankind still choose their own rules of worship, they have received the Mark of the Beast.
The ’beast’ represents worldly authority, the authority of man, and the mark is our actions that are in favor of the worldly authority. Man chooses the laws of man above the laws of God. To follow the authority of human governments above God’s law and government.
So why do people think it’s a chip? This is a distraction. The book of Revelation is full of symbolic language explained in the Old Testament. The mark on the hand and head is explained in the books of Moses where these two places were where God’s people were to remember the importance of keeping the law of God. The forhead and hand were to mark God’s authority (Deu.6:6&8; Exo.13:9). When an alternative mark by another rule is placed the same places symbolically, it means the law of God that was supposed to be there has been replaced with the mark of the beast. The authority of God is replaced with the authority of a worldly government. God’s law is violated.

Jesus knew of the attack against the Sabbath that He was the protector of. When the disciples asked about the end of the world Jesus mixed the story of the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD with the His second coming.

“But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day» (Mat 24:20)
Yes, Jesus was speaking about the importance of keeping the Sabbath holy even 40 years after His departure. By making this statement Jesus shows that nothing has changed in regards to His sabbath’s sacredness. It was still to be held in such great regard that even in a situation where they had to flee for their lives they should pray in advance that they don’t end up fleeing on the Sabbath and thus feel forced to break it. They were to pray to not end in a situation where they had to either save their lives and break the Sabbath, or keep it holy and maybe be caught by the enemy. Jesus was smart enough to mention this about Jerusalems destruction, placing His expectation for them to continue to keep the Sabbath holy long after the apostle meeting mentioned in the book of Acts and after Pauls letter to the churches. The time for this command comes after all of these letters. In case anyone would have misunderstood up until that point, Christ cleared it up by forseeing the future and proclaiming the Sabbath was still to be regarded holy even after Paul died. Christ authority in the Sabbath was to still be regarded even at the time after the apostles meeting and Paul letters. You know, just in case you had misunderstood Paul, Jesus cleared it up for you. His Sabbath was still valid.

By mixing the two events, the destruction of Jerusalem and Christ second coming, Jesus doesn’t just remind people to respect this commandment 40 years after His resurrection but He builds a bond from 70 AD to His second coming saying the Sabbath is still to be respected and is valid until He comes back. Jesus, once again, defends the Sabbath.

When Jesus spoke of the destruction of Jerusalem He said one thing was a sign to His people to flee: “When ye, therefore, shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place…”
This was Rome when they did the siege on Jerusalem. What defines something as holy?
God has declared that also His Sabbath is holy (Gen 2:3, Exo.20,11). Stepping on the Sabbath is also stepping on a holy place. The Bible teaches us that nothing can become holy unless the Holy One, God Himself, consecrate it. Holiness belongs to God alone and everything that is connected to Him. Nothing can be made holy or even unholy outside of God. Man cannot make anything holy by the Biblical standard of the term. “Holy days” and other such terms are therefore a claim of God’s consecration without the consecration. Man was not allowed to think they had the power to make anything holy by their own standard. The command was therefore important: “And that ye may put difference between holy and unholy, and between unclean and clean” (Lev 10:10) The difference between the creation of God and the creation of man was what separated something as holy and unholy. But God’s people failed to understand this over the course of time, leading even to God rejecting Jerusalem: “Her priests have violated my law, and have profaned mine holy things: they have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shewed difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from my sabbaths, and I am profaned among them” (Eze_22:26).
Yes God says He is PROFANED among His people when they hide their eyes from His sabbath. He is profaned! Synonyms for profaned? God is mocked, God is scorned, God is blasphemed, God is trashed!
The Sabbath is according to God holy. The Sunday-sabbath is not as it was never consecrated by God but by man. The problem with the Sunday-law is that it will ultimately lead to the stepping on God’s Sabbath, on God’s holy place. The warning Jesus gives when he mixes the destruction of Jerusalem and the end of the world is that it is a crime to step on God’s holy places and this is a sign to God’s people to withdraw and escape from whoever does this. When the beast and the false prophet steps on God’s Sabbath, elevating their own Sunday-sabbath in its place and wants to enforce it to everyone so that everyone will feel pressured for economical reasons to do so, they are stepping on holy ground. God is profaned among them.

So why was Christ seemingly violating the Sabbath according to the Pharisees? Didn’t Jesus show indifference and even annoyance to the Sabbath commandment? This is another twisting of the events. The devil tends to give things the opposite meaning to destroy the message in it. Jesus confronted the Jewish leaders several times on the Sabbath because He was the “Lord of the Sabbath” (Matt.12,8). The legislation of Sabbath was tied to God’s authority as creator, yet these teachers of men had mixed their own laws and regulations to the commandment. That is them trodding on holy ground. God had through Moses said that they would not rightly keep God’s law if they added or removed to it (Deut.12,32). A crime they had done. And so Jesus had to confront them and show who was the real authority of the Sabbath, only He could decide how it was to be observed as the observance of it was to worship Him. The Sabbath was made «holy» by God after creation. Man, when entering holy ground, need to humble themselves. The Pharisees and Scribes own interpretation of the Sabbath and they’re adding of rules and regulations was a crime against God’s law, and that is why Christ addressed it. Not because He was a sabbath breaker, but because He was a sabbath protector. Therefore, He said: «That the Son of man is Lord also of the sabbath» (Luk.6,5) Jesus proclaimed He was the Lord of the Sabbath.  Violating the Sabbath is, therefore, an attack on Christ authority.

The attempt to make national Sunday laws was a movement, first by Christians, later by even labor people, to “save the planet”. Either to save it from moral corruption and/or from climate change. Many Christians generally believe that God will have pleasure and bless the world if they force mankind to observe the Sunday-sabbath. So much so, they have for years tried to get the government to legislate it, and the Pope is an eager helper and contributor. He has for a long time claimed Christians in governmental positions need to try and get church legislations into the worldly governments. Imagen if the whole world would join together in keeping a day legislated by the church representing that the pope now is law-maker on earth in Christ stead? What an honor to the church, for the church, to have their changes to God’s law legislated. Their legislation and version of law over God’s law itself? What an accomplishment. Even if people do it for the climate or other reasons, the church gets what it wants. That the world abides by the rules that are the fundaments of the papal throne.
The climate change groups are agreeing, the pope is agreeing, that Sunday being the official sabbath of the world will save the planet. How can it not? Fewer emissions, more family time, unification in finding a solution to the world’s problems. How beautiful right?
The whole movement, no matter what background they have, fails to understand that God already set a sabbath day for planet Earth at creation. And by placing Sunday in its place as the earth-sabbath is rebellion against the One who Created and sustains the planet. It’s lawlessness, the uproar against the Creator, a takeover. The Creators own law and memorial of Him is by millions exchanged for the commandments of men, no matter how well-meaning it is. Sunday will not save planet earth. And because they do this legislation in God’s name, abusing God’s name for their cause, lying about God, God will bring out the original tables of stone with the truth on it. The tables will display His real sabbath. And that if we want to repent and end our rebellion, we need to put away the Sunday-command, end the forceful legislation and choose obedience to God’s Sabbath instead.
God will let them know that this Sunday-sabbath hysteria is not going to save the planet, not going to make Him restore anything, that He has no pleasure in it, that it’s not His will, that He is not glorified by these laws and that no one will be blessed for making it. He is not blind to the disadvantage given to, and the mocking, of those who will stay true to His law. Shall those obedient to the Creator loose rights and those who step on His holy things and people flourish? God won’t have it.
The only one who is glorified by these laws is the Papacy. The Papacy was originally the church

that first legislated Sunday in place of God’s Sabbath. It was their idea, they placed themselves in God’s seat and claimed the right to change God’s law as if it needed changing. And by making a national and even global Sunday legislation it’s really just honoring man and priests as lawmakers and not God. Not only that but the Papacy that stepped on God’s holy Sabbath and made their own sabbath, bears all the same titles and rule from the same city as did the “abomination of desolation” that Jesus spoke of when he compared the destruction of Jerusalem with the end of the world (Matt.24,15). A power from the same city bearing the same titles. Strange coincidence? That the governmental institution that claimed the right to change God’s law, a change the whole world follows, just happens to have inherited the titles of the Caesars that was behind the destruction of God’s temple? (Rev.13,8) That just happens to have been given their seat and authority from the same power? (Rev.13,4) Jesus links the destruction of Jerusalem with the end time, and the enemy has not changed the city of reign, they are still standing on holy places. They are still robbing God’s temple. They are still sitting like God in His temple claiming to sit in His place, to speak on His behalf, to judge on His behalf, to change His laws on His behalf (2Th 2:4). They claim to sit in God’s place here on earth. Like Babylon, they have taken the cups from the temple of God and filled them up with lies and lawlessness (Dan 5:3-4; Rev 17:2)

Legislate Sunday as Sabbath to save the planet? What a huge lie. The only one who can save the planet is God. Showing the ten commandments with the real Sabbath will show the world that there is only one law we will be judged by, that determine the destiny of the planet, and that is God’s law.

The pope was given as a gift the titles from the Caesars but he stole the titles of Christ and added them to himself. He was now the claimed high priest of the church. The Pope also did the same with the Sabbath. All the blessings the Bible gives for keeping God’s Sabbath, the pope claim is transferred to keeping Sunday. He steals God’s arguments and blessings He states for those who keep His Sabbath and say people will have all of this if they keep Sunday instead. In the Pope’s Laudato Si – Climate Change Encyclical, he claims about the Sunday Sabbath that it: “heals our relationships with God, with ourselves, with others and with the world. …it also proclaims Man’s eternal rest in God …The law of weekly rest forbade work on the seventh day”. All stolen from God’s claims for His Sabbath. He is the ultimate man of sin, claiming to speak on God’s behalf while leading you to disobedience to God.
And so the papacy claims Christ titles and he claims the blessings in the Bible given to the Sabbath-keeper will be given them if they keep Sunday instead.
It’s a lie, a great deception. A robbery of God. The pope is a thief. He steals what is not his, he claims authority that is not his. And he will be judged.
The Bible clearly claims… that no priest that rejects God’s law or the authority of the law is His appointed priest. And any such priest will be judged. “that thou shalt be no priest to me: seeing thou hast forgotten the law of thy God, I will also forget thy children. And there shall be, like people, like priest: and I will punish them for their ways, and reward them their doings.» (Hos.4,6 & 9) “For the priest’s lips should keep knowledge, and they should seek the law at his mouth: for he is the messenger of the LORD of hosts.  But ye are departed out of the way; ye have caused many to stumble at the law…” (Mal.2,7-8)
Jesus said the same thing.

The National Sunday laws are a thing to God because it effects the very part of His law that is given to proclaim His authority, and because such a law will eventually force people to break His Sabbath. And because the whole world has been fooled into thinking God will save the planet if they do this crime against Him, they are deceived and God will make sure they know they are. The Sabbath commandment is the commandment the devil attacks, as he consider that planet earth his. To him God is the thief, he claims it as his domain for the sole reason that mankind have subdued to him all these years and by it elected him as their leader. Under no circumstance will he allow the world to honor the original sabbath that reveals God is the rightful owner of the planet, and that he himself is the thief.
Creating mass worship on a Sunday-sabbath is the ultimate deception. Satan gets the world to join together in partnership against God’s Sabbath and authority all while thinking they are pleasing God while doing it. If you think you are worshipping and pleasing God you will not seek repentance.
The devil’s sin is really great, but so are those of all the priests and pastors that have helped him in presenting a gospel that says you are free to change or even break God’s laws.

The last conflict is about authority. Satan has used Sunday as sabbath as an attack against God and to fool millions of believers, and he has done so successfully for hundreds of years. But the deception has always been limited, in the end, the whole world will follow his lead.

There have been many Sunday laws up through the ages. Sunday laws are not The Mark of The Beast mentioned in Revelation until a certain point in time. Why? Because it’s a mark of authority. Only when God has presented the truth and the real law and the real Sabbath, and the world is enlightened about the two authorities and chose by their actions to obey one authority over the other, they have taken “the mark”. Satan will then as a last desperate attempt show himself as Jesus coming to say that He wants the world to keep Sunday as Sabbath and that He has really changed it. He shines with kindness, he heals and does good deeds. Will they follow a manifestation of Jesus claiming it right to break God’s law over the Bible? He will deceive multitudes. In Christ warning to the people leaving in the end times, he didn’t just warn against the enemy standing on holy ground, to pray they don’t end up breaking the Sabbath, but he also warned: “Take heed that no man deceive you.  For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many” (Matt.24,4-5). Jesus had to endure a similar temptation when the devil came to him in the wilderness as an angel of light claiming to be sent from God with a message. Christ rejected the manifestation and used the word of God, the Bible, to expose him. (Mat.4,4) Are you able to put God’s word and His law first and reject a manifestation that appears to be Christ Himself telling you to break God’s law? The devils first cover was a serpent, his last cover is as Christ. Christ second coming is described with characteristics in Scripture that all has to be fulfilled in order for it to be the real Jesus.
This is the events tied to the real coming of Jesus.
1. Everyone will see it: “For as the lightning, that lighteneth out of the one part under heaven, shineth unto the other part under heaven; so shall also the Son of man be in his day.” (Luk.17,24)
2. Jesus will come on a cloud with angels wearing a crown and a sickle: “And I looked, and behold a white cloud, and upon the cloud one sat like unto the Son of man, having on his head a golden crown, and in his hand a sharp sickle” ( Rev 14:14). 
3. We will come to Him, not Him to us: “Then we who are alive, who are left, will be caught up in the clouds together with them to meet the Lord in the air; and so we will be with the Lord forever. “ (1.Thess.4,16-17)
4. The dead will rise when He comes: “For the Lord Himself, with a cry of command, with the archangel’s call and with the sound of God’s trumpet, will descend from heaven, and the dead in Christ will rise first” (1.Thess.4,16-17); John 5:28-29)
4. He comes at an unexpected hour (no time prophecy fulfillment) Matt.24,42-44)
5. He comes in glory with ALL the holy angels, meaning probably thousands upon thousands of angels. “When the Son of man shall come in his glory, and all the holy angels with him, then shall he sit upon the throne of his glory” (Mat 25:31)
Do not be fooled by someone claiming to be Jesus who says you can freely break the fundament of His throne. If a house is in conflict with itself it cannot remain to stand, Christ once said. If Jesus is in conflict with His own law, His Fathers law, the house will not remain standing.

Why the angel said what he said to Ron Wyatt:
This the reason behind the angel telling Ron that the tables of stone will be shown after the National Sunday laws. This is why God is going to choose this point in time to show them.
The world is in a mess, human and animal life is in danger. The call it the sixth mass extinction, but in reality, it’s the second and the last. The earth is, however, struggling.
He wants to address the world with the only solution, to turn back to Him as lawgiver and savior. But if man continues to rebel and make their own laws in place of His, He will judge the world instead of saving it.

God will give His blessings if His Sabbath is respected. It was on His sabbath the priests placed fresh bread on the table of shewbread in the tabernacle. Christ is in the tabernacle in heaven doing priestly service (Lev 24:8). In the Bible, bread symbolizes His word and Christ Himself (Joh.6,35, Matt.4,4). He renews knowledge of Himself and His word to His people on His elected holy day. That is why “The Revelation of Jesus Christ, which God gave unto him, to shew unto his servants things which must shortly come to pass…» was given as a blessing to the church on, that is right, the sabbath day: «I was in the Spirit on the Lord’s day,» (Rev.1, 1 & 10)
Some claim this is speaking of Sunday, another great lie. In the Bible there is only one day that is called «the Lord’s day» and that is the Sabbath. The book of revelation

takes us through the sanctuary in heaven and Christ priestly service, the word is given in the sabbath day like the law said it would.
God sanctifies His people on the sabbath day. (Esek.20,12)
The book of Revelation was given to God’s people who respected His Sabbath day (Rev.1,1; 12,17, 14,12).
Today the book of revelation is interpreted by people who reject God’s law and Sabbath, the result is that false interpretation about the end time events is circulating all over the churches and the web.
God spirit of truth, if you want to know the truth, is given to those who respect God’s law and follow Christ: «If ye love me, keep my commandments.  And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you.» (Joh 14:15-17)
If you want to know the real truth, expose the devil’s deception, the false prophets, God will reveal it to you as soon as you stop the rebellion against His law and Sabbath. And the truth will set you free from the devils lies and the false gospel and give you peace in Him.
Do not take any part in the legislation of the Sunday-sabbath, don’t vote for its legislators or work with them in any other ways regarding religious laws. Do not take part in the battle against God’s authority.

Choose therefore today, who your king and God is.


  1. Danielle Rzeszotarski

    I enjoy and appreciate all the videos.
    And interestingg article, but you forgot to mention which day is God’s Sabbath??? Is it Saturday???

    • Hi, I felt I dealt with the topic very thoroughly in the movie “The King’s Seal” and other publications and so I didn’t think of specifying here. But as you are asking there might be a need to specify so I added in that info. Thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate it !

  2. This is the ONE Commandment people do not KNOW they are breaking and so the devil REAPS souls by the billions unless they are TOLD….

  3. Petri heikkinen

    Finish language bible i need!?

  4. Setareki Nasogasoga

    Thanks for sharing the truth of Gods word ..GB

  5. I feel so conflicted at the moment. I have been in constant prayer since I found your information. I can’t tell you how much it has blessed my life. I’m not sure why I feel so strange about the National Sunday Law… maybe because it was originally SDA. Maybe because of our nation. I am a true Sabbath observer, and a believer in our ,Messiah Yeshua. I even keep the feast days.

    • Hi, Tanja thank you for leaving a comment. About national Sunday laws, it’s not SDA as many think. The first Sunday laws enforced started during the Roman Empire, continued by Church councils. The great splits between early Christians were often tied to the church change of God’s times. The change of Passover caused in large part the split between the Orthodox and Catholic churches. The changing of God’s times have been a conflict long before there was ever an SDA, however, the Adventist read the historical background and realized this and then started sharing it while other church denominations didn’t think it was important. When California made Sunday laws in the late 1800s among the resistance movement were Adventists, Jews, and even Chinese who all were arrested and put on trial. They needed to keep open six days to sustain themselves and compete in the market and the laws favored Sunday keepers. So many were arrested. Sunday laws affect more than one group of people and always have, and therefore been a topic for others with different background. In Europe, there has been discrimination against Sabbath-keepers for a long time and various Sunday laws. US have been one of the few countries promoting freedom and when they, with their influence, go back to Middle Age principles enforcing such laws it will have a great impact on other nations as well. I think the reason what the US does is so relevant is because of the power and influence it now has. When North Korea, Russia, Iran didn’t do as they wanted they punished them by preventing trade (buying and selling). When USA promotes/makes by law something against God’s law the consequence, therefore, will have a global effect and when resistance against God is global, God will have to act for the sake of His commandment keeping people.

      • I was really unsure if you would see my comment! Thank you for responding and for giving such a wonderful explanation! I think I feel very confident that the Sunday Laws have been in place for ions, but I guess I question the National Sunday Law enforcement in the future. Like you said so many have fought against it in the past because of one reason or another. The progressive nation ( it doesn’t seem) would ever have it. But you mentioned at the end of your response that there would be “something” that would go against God’s law, and force all to make a choice.. I really started thinking.
        What could it be? Currently being in these times, with the coronavirus, quarantine, and actually where I live my county and state reopening, people to be more concerned with taking a vaccination. It seems it may be a requirement for at least buying in stores. And will be a requirement for school and work places.
        Thank you again for responding. If you have a moment maybe you could share your thoughts.
        God bless! And I am so eager to learn so much!

  6. Alan K Wyant

    How do I know if the american calendar day Saturday is the the real “Sabbath Saturday”?
    Are we supposed to do the same things on the Sabbath day that Jesus did?

    • The American calendar day Saturday is just the same calendar that has existed throughout history. Jews have kept the order of the week the past couple of thousands of years, but also other countries around the world historically speaking has had the same order. It was European countries that started to depict Sunday as the last day. See our film called “The King’s Seal’ to know more: https://arkfiles.net/the-kings-seal-the-ark-the-blood-and-the-seal-part-4/

  7. Gerald Giraldi

    The popes “cover story” of why he changed the Ten Commandments and replaced Saturday with sunday as the “new” sabbath (I think in 537 AD) was “because Christ rose from the dead on a sunday”, but the main reason, that I have read and I believe is true, was to “grow” the church by attracting pagans, the “sun” worshipers, to the “new” catholic church. If one does further research it can be found (whether true or not), other catholic church “teachings”, possibly influenced by pagans, that have also led to more pagan as well as other converts to the new religion.

  8. Jon Ericksen Mahoney

    If you have an email-newsletter,can you please put me on,thank you,best regards,please check out “” Power of Prophecy”” newsletter online or call for free newsletter 1 800 234 word,tell them Jon Maloney sent you,thank youJon Mahoney

  9. Thank you for the time that you took on this text.
    People truly are lost, millions truly believe in the Pope as the Highest Autorithy, it is even said in the Churches in the Mass introduced in the final parts in some of the prayings , for example: I believe in God Al Mighty, in The Roman Catholic Church and Pope Francis…” something to that effect.
    I will go to a mass one of these days and have more attention to that part and post it .
    But it is truly sad that this is so crazy mixed in confusion tha the regular Christian doesn’t stand a chance in getting this type of information.
    The old lady that goes to church, the middle age worker that goes to mass on Sunday, the young priest helper, etc etc are all milles away off this stuf. Even i somethimes have trouble getting informed and i seek information, rathe long the ” regular folk”.
    Most of the people will be gladlly joining Sunday Law because they don’t know better and they do everything they told. The lunatics of the climate change and the radicals will jump with joy with that.
    But , acordding to Wiatt, to me what is the smoking gun is when ” you can’t buy or sell” . I think that it is when the banks pressure Governments to eliminate phisical currency and go all out digital money and who says no will not be allowed to ” buy or sell” because will not be registered.
    Just my ideia. It is already in place the idea and it isn’t even a conspiracy but just a matter of time. With the COVID-19 epidemic a lot of people started to push that agenda saying that in a world without bills and coins the diseases will spread a lot less, because money is a way of getting something very fast form one corner of the world to the other, etc.
    Eyes open.

  10. All this debate about a Day, when every Commandment of God is broken every day by billions of human beings, in thought, word and deed… in Revelation 21: 6 – 8. It is written very clearly…

    Revelation 21:6-8 King James Version
    6 And he said unto me, It is done. I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. I will give unto him that is athirst of the fountain of the water of life freely.

    7 He that overcometh shall inherit all things; and I will be his God, and he shall be my son.

    8 But the fearful, and unbelieving, and the abominable, and murderers, and whoremongers, and sorcerers, and idolaters, and all liars, shall have their part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone: which is the second death.

    Read, 1 Corinthians 13: the whole Chapter.

    The Sabath was made for Man, not Man for the Sabbath the words of Jesus, if every person went to Church on Saturdey, but broke even one of the other Commandments, they would go straight to hell. Read James 2: You must be Born Again. Gospel of John 3: 4: 11:
    The preaching of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing. Keep your eyes on Jesus the Way to life, His Way is the narrow Way and few there are who find it.. Read Hebrews 1:

    • I agree with you, going to church on the right day has no significance if you are not purged in Christ’s blood or if you steal, murder, etc. The question is not what you and I think, but what God thinks.
      He himself says the importance of keeping His law in the last conflict (Rev.14,12) and say the faith of Jesus is only one part. The reason we give attention to the sabbath is that it is forgotten or disregarded. Christ’s blood is excepted by most Christian, and so we discuss the topic which is not. There has to be room to talk about in-depth topics. If the topic is Biblical it should benefit anyone regardless. If we are threatened by a conversation about God’s law or theology our hearts might not be where they should be. Jesus said it is important we worship Him in truth: “But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him” (Joh_4:23). God is not honored if we teach and practice lies in His name. Actually, the sabbath commandment is the only commandment that says how God wishes Himself to be worshipped. If we disregard that we are practically denying God the worship He asks for.
      The sabbath was made for man and not man-made for the sabbath is a principle broken by the Pharisees in their day. The whole earth was created for man, nature, animals, the sun, and the moon. All to the benefits of man. It does not mean you can treat them however you want.
      The sabbath was placed to bless man in holy communion with God their Creator. He said He would use this day to renew them, sanctify them, and to create an identity with Him. We were not created so the sabbath could be observed, we observe it as a celebration of our relationship with God. The jews in Christ day ruined that. Jesus did not say this to give your permission to disregard God’s law, if He had then He would not have been the Messiah’s prophecied in the law and the prophet which clearly warned that if anyone came with such a message he was not sent by God.
      Jesus Himself showed the Sabbath was important AFTER THE CROSS when He said about the time the Romans would siege Jerusalem: “Pray that your flight be not on the sabbath day” (Mat_24:20). Why should they pray about that? Because they should pray not to end in a situation where they would feel forced to break it.
      Even if the day does not matter to your personally we can not put help see that it clearly matters to God. And if we love God, what is important to Him should be important to us. And if we do not understand why it should matter to God we should ask Him why and try figure it out.
      Let me suggest, for a better and wider understanding you read our other articles:

      • Can you please teach us how to keep the sabbath? Do we have to read the Bible all day? Do we have to pray for longer periods of time? Are we allowed to travel? Play sports? Play video games, spend time outside with family etc… I’m very confused as how to actually follow the sabbath

        • Jesus said the sabbath was made for man and not man for the sabbath. It is not to be kept to earn salvation but to get closer to God and to fellowship with others. It is to give us something, not us it. It is a privilege and an invitation and if we view it in a legalistic way we end up like the Pharisees in the time of Jesus. So it is important to remember that Jesus was opposed to fanaticism or adding rules and regulations to the day that God has not mentioned (See Deu.12:32). According to the law, no one is allowed to add to the law or remove from it and so sometimes people are tempted to add many rules to how to keep Gods law that ends up interfering with the purpose of it. So this is good to remember. There is a liberal pit and an extreme pit. Understanding this can help us keep the sabbath.
          In the Bible, the following directions are given:
          1. Remember it (Exo.20:8)
          2. The seventh day is Sabbath for “the Lord thy God” (Exo.20:10), so consider it is “holy” in His eyes.
          3. No work should be done on this day, nor should you have anyone work for you. (Exo. 20:10)
          4. “Call the sabbath a delight” (Isa.58:13)
          5. “not doing thine own ways, nor finding thine own pleasure, nor speaking thine own words” (Isa.58:13). God wants us to take the time off what we normally do and spend it with Him. It does not mean you have to sit and read the Bible all day, it can be done in many ways. By being around other believers, or being in nature studying God’s creation. (Isaiah 58:13) By caring for others. It is healthy to take your mind off all the noise and problems the rest of the world is consumed with on the Sabbath. Remember it is a blessing to you. If you are in company with people talking about everything else, it will of course take your mind off the things of God.
          6. Don’t think the Sabbath is only for some, also the strangers (from other nations, backgrounds etc) shall be encouraged to be part of this blessing. So don’t be afraid to invite others to join you. (Isaiah 56:6)
          7. Remember, Jesus is Lord of the Sabbath (Matt.12:8). So we can follow His teaching in doing good on the sabbath.
          8. Let the sabbath be a sign between you and God that it is really God leading you (Ezek.20:20)

          The jews, the messianic, and other Christians keeping the sabbath have a similar approach to it. Normally they have a nice meal on Friday night welcoming the sabbath. It is usually made special, lights are lit, and they make a cozy happy atmosphere. And then spending time with other believers (if possible) on the following morning/afternoon. If you do not have people to worship with, pray to God to lead you to someone/somewhere. It is always strengthening to be with others, even if it is online.
          If you can’t, then make the sabbath a delight where you strengthen your bond with Him wherever you are.
          When it comes to the specific things you mentioned, pray and follow your conscience from the guidelines God has given. Remember these guidelines are not given to take from you your liberties but to make sure you are open for the blessings God wants to give you. If your mind is everywhere else on that day it can be hard to be open to the things God wishes to teach you.

          Hope this helps!

  11. Gabriel

    Concerned, here. Christ claimed that the Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath (Mark 2:27). The religious leaders of Christ’s day were constantly throwing the Sabbath into His face, claiming that He and His disciples were breaking it. He rebuked Pharisees numerous times after performing miracles, plucking the heads of grain (Mark 2:23), etc. on the Sabbath.
    We are told to “let no one judge you in food or in drink, or regarding a festival or a new moon or sabbaths, which are a shadow of things to come, but the substance is of Christ.” (Colossians 2:16-17). The early church was harshly persecuted by the Jews, who accused early believers of “breaking God’s Law.” As a result, some in the church reverted back to keeping certain aspects of the Law for purification (circumcision, foods, etc.) in addition to trusting in the Sacrifice of Christ.
    The entire third chapter of Galatians addresses this very topic in great detail, even calling those who seek justification through the Law “foolish” and “bewitched.” Verses 24 and 25 state the entire purpose of the Law: “But before faith came, we were kept under guard by the law, kept for the faith which would afterward be revealed. Therefore the law was our tutor to bring us to Christ, that we might be justified by faith. But after faith has come, we are no longer under a tutor.” (Gal 3:24-25).
    The book of Romans also addresses how believers should treat foods, specific days, etc. as well as how to treat fellow believers whose opinions may vary on these topics. Verse 5 stands out in particular: “One person esteems one day above another; another esteems every day alike. Let each be fully convinced in his own mind.” (Rom 14:5).

    Christ did not abolish the Sabbath; rather, He introduced a deeper rest than a weekly Sabbath day could offer; a rest that we must be “diligent to enter into.” (Heb 4:11) .
    How do we enter that rest? By “keeping Saturday instead of Sunday?” Hebrews 4 addresses the Sabbath rest for God’s people: “For we who have believed do enter that rest, as He has said: ‘So I swore in My wrath, “‘They shall not enter My rest,”‘ although the works were finished from the foundation of the world.
    For He has spoken in a certain place of the seventh day in this way: “And God rested on the seventh day from all His works”; and again in this place: “They shall not enter My rest.”
    Since therefore it remains that some must enter it, and those to whom it was first preached did not enter because of disobedience, again He designates a certain day, saying in David, “Today,” after such a long time, as it has been said: ‘Today, if you will hear His voice, do not harden your hearts.’ For if Joshua had given them rest, then He would not afterward have spoken of another day. There remains therefore a rest for the people of God. For he who has entered His rest has himself also ceased from his works as God did from His.” (Heb 4:1-8).

    • I understand your concern and all your points are traditional views and interpretations used against God’s law and the Sabbath. The majority of Christians will agree with you and have been taught the resistance you are sharing, which is why I say I understand your concern. You have been coached by churches to have these concerns and view God’s law as a competitor to the cross. These misunderstandings come from the early mixing of pagan and Judeo-Christian understandings, meaning that words and sentences are taken out of the historical and ethnic context and made to fit modern conflicts. In the Bible, there is only one law that competes with the cross and that is the sacrificial laws and the earthly sanctuary system. It is important to understand the difference between the moral-laws and sacrificial laws. One defines sin (the moral law which includes the Sabbath) and the other is a system of laws that provides atonement for sin (the sacrificial laws). When Christ died on the cross He atoned (a sacrifice) for our sins (the breaking of moral law). If the moral law could be done away with, Christ needed not to die. If it was done away with on the cross, no one has sinned since the cross. You can not be a lawbreaker without a law to break. And you do not need atonement without breaking a law. Ultimately, this means there is no need for Jesus after the cross, that is IF the moral law was nailed to the cross. Because there is no sin where there is no law. Paul tries to explain these things but is very misunderstood by many Christian denominations.
      Christ replaced all the sacrificial laws with His atonement. From that point on there was no need for any of the sacrificial laws of the old system. Now, we are saved through Christ’s sacrifice within the new system or the new covenant. Because God’s moral law (which includes the Sabbath) still stands, we still need Christ’s atonement and seek His mercy after the cross.
      What many Christians today completely misunderstand is that they think the moral law is kept as a way to atone for the breaking of the same law. This “foolishness” as you call it. The moral law, and the keeping of it if you are educated in the laws and prophets, NEVER ATONED FOR SIN. NEVER. It only pointed out what sin is. The actions described in the sacrificial laws atoned for those sins (because they symbolized Christ’s atonement). The moral law is not kept to atone for previous wrongs, they do not have that power. It is the same in the court system today. If you stand before a judge because you were caught stealing you can not get it erased by saying you did not steal in the other store, this is somewhat ridiculous thinking. But when you are released after doing your time, you are still expected to not steal. Not to compensate for having stolen in the past, but because that is the demand of the moral law. And if you break it again, you will need atonement again which is a different law addressing sin/lawbreaking.
      The faith that replaced the law is again the laws regarding the sacrifices. Instead of carrying the sacrifice to the temple and watching it being slain for your sin and receiving pardon through God’s visible mediators, you now have to believe in Christ’s atonement on the cross that you can not see and believe in His pardon/mercy. A physical demonstration of atonement is replaced with the belief in Christ’s merit for our sake.

      The problem in the first Christian era is that the Jewish temple remained for another 40 years. Many continued to practice the sacrificial laws which can be seen in acts when even Paul is persuaded to partake in a cleansing ritual in the temple by his fellow Christians.
      The second problem was that Jews were not allowed to eat with pagans. The first Jewish converts wanted to respect all the extra Jewish laws and regulations in the hope of being accepted by their Jewish brethren, and somehow helping them convert to Christ. This meant that they could not eat with the pagan converts, they were considered unclean because they were not uncircumcised, and this all lead to a split among the first Christians. The Jewish converts would not worship or eat the Lord’s supper with the pagan converts. The pagan converts felt discriminated against and solved this in two different ways. One group was in part persuaded to convert to Judaism to then accept Christ. This was because the first Jewish Christians believed they had to become Jews to become Christians. This meant they had to follow the rules of Jewish conversion in order to worship with the others, they had to follow the rabbinic laws and be circumcised. Even more, they had to take part in the Jewish ritual system. This horrified Paul who claimed that these laws were no longer valid as atonement and that all they needed was Christ’s atonement. They did not have to convert to Judaism to be Christians. He also claimed that Jewish converts and pagan converts should worship together as one body. A radical thought for the first Jews as they considered themselves to become unclean by doing so. And so, they needed to get this idea out of their heads. And these pagan converts that wanted to join the group in this manner needed to understand that they went back to the old covenant system which was no longer in effect for either Jews or pagans in the new covenant system. The converted Jews knew they would be seen as ‘fallen’ by their Jewish brethren and many would not even touch them. It was a real struggle for them to change their way of thinking regarding this.
      But in no way was this about the moral laws. The Bible is crystal clear about the fact that they can not be done away with because they define sin. Their validity is the reason we need Christ’s atonement.
      Paul does not say what he says so those who do not keep Gods law and Sabbath can feel good about themselves. His address was for the pagans and for the converted Jews that were eating with these pagans. The converted Jews were condemned for keeping the Sabbath and the feasts with the uncircumcised and declared unclean by it. Same with the converted pagans for eating and feasting without being circumcised. It was seen as sacrilegious and they were condemned. Many were persuaded that they had no part in these blessings as heathens. But Paul, again and again, stated they did have part through Christ. Paul states they are allowed to do these things by being circumcised in Christ, and that they are clean and can therefore take part. So what Paul expressed to argue in favor of pagans keeping God’s Sabbath and feasts has been switched around to mean the opposite by the Roman church. That they have no part and should instead make their own traditions. Paul, in his letter to the Romans, stated that there are not two ‘trees’. There’s not one Christianity for Jews and another one for pagans. Rather, the converted pagans are grafted onto the same stem and tree that the Jews are on. Meaning they become part of Israel, not an independent group.
      Paul claims that those who had not first converted to rabbinic Judaism should not be condemned for keeping the sabbaths and feasts but be accepted as clean. Because these things belong to Christ, they point to Christ and therefore belong to Christ and His followers and not the fanatic Jewish rabbinical ideas. And if the converted pagans belonged to Christ, so did the things pointing to Christ. This teaching was met with great resistance by the unconverted Jews (and many of the converted) and they felt it was blasphemous. In the end, this gossip lead to the false accusations that were thrown against Paul at the temple, that he was bringing heathens into its courtyard. They felt Paul was destroying their customs by allowing those who had not been circumcised and converted to Judaism to take part in what they felt was Jewish privilege.
      The pagan Christians were told they could not eat at the feast’s table, that they could not keep the sabbaths… They were judged as someone unclean, making God’s things unclean with their presence. But Paul says, do not let them judge you, for you are clean through Christ. Meaning they could take part.
      Naturally, many Jews who accepted Christ thought a lot of conflicts would end if only the pagan Christians converted to Judaism according to Jewish law first. However, Paul did not believe this solution was going to lead things in the right direction. They would be forced to take part in sacrificial rituals that were already fulfilled in Christ and oral laws that Christ spoke against.
      In Galatians, we see the pagans here had been in part persuaded that they had to convert to Judaism to take part in God’s blessings and be counted as Israelites. But Paul speaks up against this, and then he also addresses several of them for making another mistake. Instead of taking part in the blessings and moral law of God, they had gone back to their pagan roots and pagan holy times. Notice the wording in Galatians when Paul speaks of times and seasons, he says they kept the same when they were unconverted before knowing the Jewish God. Therefore, here he is speaking of a group that was first told they needed to convert to Judaism to be accepted to the table of Christ and then he rebukes that idea, and then consequently rebukes them for going back to pagan times and traditions and mixing that with Christ instead. Both were wrong. Both were false.
      So back to today, Christians have ended up doing what Paul spoke against. They separate themselves from God-given blessings and the Sabbath, thinking they have no part in that as pagans, and instead keep old pagan customs in Christ’s name. To top it off, they use Galatians to support doing exactly what Paul spoke against. That is how thoroughly scriptural interpretations have been twisted.

      No matter what church, mosque, or synagogue you are in, you will see the same thing. Formalists, extremists, conservatives, liberals, and reformers. You will also have those who add rules and regulations far beyond what is described in their spiritual books.
      This is the case in the time of Jesus as well. He belonged to none of these fractions, rather He represented the truth from God. His interpretation and practice of the law and the prophets was the correct one.
      This is why they accused Jesus of breaking the law while Jesus himself claimed He had kept it. It was about the interpretation of the law, it was about the added regulations to the law.
      In the law, God said they were not allowed to add or remove from the law to keep it correctly, something Jesus respected. But the Jews did not respect this requirement. Their oral law (later called Talmud) had interpreted the law to such a degree that they had added many customs and laws. The Talmud was illegal according to the Torah, and Jesus let them know this fact. Yes, there are many sabbath laws in the Oral law, Talmud, but these are not part of God’s sabbath law.
      Jesus never spoke against the law or the sabbath, only their practice which was distorting it.
      When Jesus said the sabbath was made for man, it was to bring back the correct understanding of it. Just like God told us not to kill, steal, commit adultery, etc. All of these laws were equally made for man, for man’s benefit. As a matter of fact, all of God’s moral laws were for man’s benefit. Even the first commandment that taught them to have no other God than Him. Even this is for man’s benefit as having multiple gods often leads to war and conflict. All of God’s moral laws are an expression of God wishing man well. However, these laws were easily understood to be for man’s benefit, while on the other hand, they made the Sabbath into some kind of “offering” to an angry God. God had said that the Sabbath was something God would use to “sanctify” them, again to man’s benefit. Having a special relationship with God at His appointed time was for our good and that is why the Sabbath was part of the moral law. It does not mean we can choose it away. Jesus was trying to teach them the correct way to keep the Sabbath after it was distorted, He did not speak against the commandment itself.
      This is evident when Jesus later says about the year 70 AD (long after He has gone back to heaven) ‘pray that your flight is not on the Sabbath or the winter’. Jesus showed no knowledge of His words being used to abolish the Sabbath. Instead, He tells His followers, the Christians, to pray that their flight is not on the Sabbath. If, as you say: “Christ did not abolish the Sabbath; rather, He introduced a deeper rest than the weekly Sabbath day…” then why does He tell His followers to respect the Sabbath still? Even at a time of escape? He did not replace it. In the book of Acts, we see Paul keeping the Sabbath multiple times even together with the pagans. If indeed he in Galatians meant keeping God’s Sabbath was a rejection of Christ, why did he keep it himself and teach the pagans to do so as well? Paul claims that He keeps the law. He is not contradicting himself, he is just misunderstood because people do not understand what moral laws are and what atonement/sacrificial laws are.
      If you are knowledgeable in the law and the prophet you know there are different sabbaths, all symbolizing rest in their own peculiar ways. you have the weekly Sabbath which is weekly rest. You have the feast sabbaths which represent rest in Christ’s merits. You have the seventh sabbath year cycle which represents rest and release from captivity and the fiftieth year which again represents rest in freedom. None of these sabbaths do away with the others, they compliment each other and the sum of them all preach the gospel and the hope of the future rest. The Sabbath law was not a law that came AFTER SIN, instead, it came BEFORE SIN. It was not a law added after sin because it is not related to sin but to paradise as seen in Genesis.
      Paul speaks in Hebrew about another rest referring to the rest that Israel hoped to achieve in the holy land. However, they never had that rest because they were unfaithful. The rest now promised is the new earth or heaven. The two “rests” in conflict here is not the Sabbath against this rest, but Israel seeking a worldly kingdom and its rest in that instead of the coming kingdom of Christ.

      The problem with bible interpretations is that many things are taken away from their root meaning. There is only one author in the Bible that the Bible itself warns us against misunderstanding, and that is Paul. And the whole idea that we can now break God’s law is a gospel originating from misinterpreting Paul.

      All these things I have written here are supported in scripture, and I go through bible verse after bible verse proving it in the book “WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH SUNDAY LAWS”.
      Link: https://thirdangelsmessage.com/Downloads/sundaylaws_LAST_medium_new_11_10_2020.pdf
      I did not add all the references here as there is no point in rewriting the studies in the commentary field. I strongly recommend you read this small PDF book to be acquainted with how Paul is understood in harmony with the law and the prophets, Jesus and the other apostles, rather than him having to stand alone seemingly contradicting all of the others. It is a good idea to educate yourself on how those who keep God’s moral law (not to atone for sin, but to show regret and a willingness to turn from continuing the sin) understand scripture. This way you can at least understand this point of view. They are the ones who have been persecuted since Rome converted to Christianity, not the ones who reject God’s law. Those who continued keeping God’s law have been killed in great numbers throughout time. They are persecuted by both Jews and Christians. Jews still hold them in contempt and judge them for keeping the sabbath as Christians and Christians still hold them in contempt for believing they are part of Israel’s fundament rather than the pagan fundament. Time has in other words, not changed that much.

      If the book is too much of a challenge, I would also recommend my article:
      The Jerusalem council and the sabbath. https://arkfiles.net/the-jerusalem-council-and-the-sabbath/
      Thank you for sharing your concerns and stopping by this webpage.
      God bless.

      The Ark of the covenant discovery is God exposing the false teachings and the twisting of Paul’s words. It calls for Christians to return to God’s moral law and culture and reject the pagan-Christian practices. Christians are meant to be part of Israel. Jews have to accept Messiah because their ceremonial laws cannot atone for their sins. They have to accept Jesus to be counted among Israel. In this discovery, God addresses both false doctrines and reveals there is only one true one, only one way to be saved. By confessing sin against His moral law, admitting you have sinned when broken it, and seeking through faith atonement for these transgressions through the blood of Christ.

      Also check out our video called PAUL AND THE LAW: https://arkfiles.net/paul-and-the-law/

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.